<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Parents&#039; Forum &#187; Panics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/tag/panics/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum</link>
	<description>For parents who can think for themselves</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:20:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Next meetup: The government&#8217;s review on the sexualisation of children</title>
		<link>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/sexualisation-children-meetup/ </link>
		<comments>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/sexualisation-children-meetup/ #comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 16:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexualisation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/?p=331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wednesday 13 July 2011, 7pm

The review has sparked off a huge discussion about whether there is a  pornification of society that needs to be addressed; or whether there  is an increasing anxiety about sex and children, which has nothing to do  with pop videos, but has a lot to do with adults [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/sexualisation-children-meetup/ /feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Next Parents&#8217; Forum: Are young girls being sexualized?</title>
		<link>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/next-parents-forum-are-young-girls-being-sexualized/ </link>
		<comments>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/next-parents-forum-are-young-girls-being-sexualized/ #comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Panics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexualisation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/?p=250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[March 2010 7pm
In our seemingly ceaseless appetite to problematise teenagers, the latest discussion is the sexualisation of children. Cameron and Balls are fighting it out as to who identified this issue first, and who can introduce the most regulations against advertisers.
This forum critically examines are children being sexualized? What does this mean? What is the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/next-parents-forum-are-young-girls-being-sexualized/ /feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah&#8217;s Law</title>
		<link>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/sarahs-law/ </link>
		<comments>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/sarahs-law/ #comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Panics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child protection policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/?p=237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is something so profoundly upsetting and depressing about the implementation of Sarah&#8217;s law.
10 years ago Sarah Payne was abducted and murdered by a convicted sex offender. It was a crime of opportunity-Sarah was playing in a field, and her abductor happened to be driving by and seized the child. It is every parent&#8217;s worst [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/sarahs-law/ /feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Stroller Panic That Wasn&#8217;t</title>
		<link>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/the-stroller-panic-that-wasnt/ </link>
		<comments>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/the-stroller-panic-that-wasnt/ #comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nancy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Panics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclaren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strollers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/?p=188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Could the fevered climate of concern about children’s safety be reaching its limits? Maybe.
This month the Maclaren stroller company issued a massive “recall” of every stroller sold in the United States since 1999 because of reports that 14 children had, over the years amputated fingers when they caught them in the hinges of the stroller.
Of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/the-stroller-panic-that-wasnt/ /feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

