<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Parents&#039; Forum &#187; family policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/tag/family-policy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum</link>
	<description>For parents who can think for themselves</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:20:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Next meetup: The government&#8217;s review on the sexualisation of children</title>
		<link>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/sexualisation-children-meetup/ </link>
		<comments>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/sexualisation-children-meetup/ #comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 16:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexualisation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/?p=331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wednesday 13 July 2011, 7pm

The review has sparked off a huge discussion about whether there is a  pornification of society that needs to be addressed; or whether there  is an increasing anxiety about sex and children, which has nothing to do  with pop videos, but has a lot to do with adults [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/sexualisation-children-meetup/ /feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Child Protection</title>
		<link>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/child-protection/ </link>
		<comments>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/child-protection/ #comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child protection policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/?p=304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[25 November 2010
We will be looking at the subject of child protection as Eileen Monroe’s report has recently been published:
Download the Munroe Review of Child Protection report

Venue TBC: Contact Jane Sandeman at parents@instituteofideas.com for details.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/child-protection/ /feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Early Intervention: Good Parents, Great Kids, Better Citizens</title>
		<link>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/early-intervention/ </link>
		<comments>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/early-intervention/ #comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/?p=295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[14th October 2010
The topic was the Graham Allen and Iain Duncan Smith document &#8211; Good Parents, Great Kids, Better Citizens.
Download Good Parents, Great Kids, Better Citizens
Although the Con/Lib Dem Coalition has not yet set out family policy, this gives a flavour of their key thoughts around this area.
Venue TBC: Contact Jane Sandeman at parents@instituteofideas.com for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/early-intervention/ /feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sure Start</title>
		<link>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/next-meetup-sure-start/ </link>
		<comments>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/next-meetup-sure-start/ #comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 12:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sure Start]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/?p=270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We met on Thursday 27th May 2010 in Central London to discuss SureStart.
In all the discussions around the general election there is one thing all commentators and parties have agreed on &#8211; that is that Sure Start is a good thing. This forum will look at why is Sure Start so feted; and what will [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/next-meetup-sure-start/ /feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Summary of the parties&#8217; policies on families</title>
		<link>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/summary-policies-families/ </link>
		<comments>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/summary-policies-families/ #comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/?p=265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a useful summary put together by Civitas:
www.civitas.org.uk/pubs/familyoverview.php
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/summary-policies-families/ /feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How much intelligence do parents need?</title>
		<link>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/how-much-intelligence-do-parents-need/ </link>
		<comments>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/how-much-intelligence-do-parents-need/ #comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[learning disabilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/?p=184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a thought-provoking article by Minette Marrin in yesterday&#8217;s Sunday Times, here. Her basic point is that people with severe learning disabilities should not have children, because of the difficulties involved in raising them and the cost to the state of the necessary care.
I do have a small measure of sympathy for her frustration with [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/how-much-intelligence-do-parents-need/ /feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There&#8217;s more to human character than sharing toys</title>
		<link>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/human-character-sharing-toys/ </link>
		<comments>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/human-character-sharing-toys/ #comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blame the parents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social mobility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/?p=176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Jennie Bristow
(Reprinted from Spiked Online 16 November 2009)
A new report by the British think-tank Demos has hit the headlines, with its claim that &#8216;Parents are the principal architects of a fairer society&#8217;. Based on research from the Millennium Cohort Study, the report argues that how children are parented has a more significant impact upon [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/human-character-sharing-toys/ /feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Children&#8217;s Wellbeing in the family</title>
		<link>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/childrens-wellbeing-in-the-family/ </link>
		<comments>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/childrens-wellbeing-in-the-family/ #comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child wellbeing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supernanny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wellbeing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/?p=156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today I attended a meeting of the All Party Parliamentary Group for Children and the Associate Parliamentary Group for Parents and Families (a bit of a mouthful!) which has chosen &#8216;Children&#8217;s Wellbeing&#8217; as its theme for 2008/9. Having already discussed children’s wellbeing in the context of social care and schools (meetings that I unfortunately missed), this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.parentswithattitude.com/parentsforum/childrens-wellbeing-in-the-family/ /feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

