![]() |
Parenting debates at the Battle of Ideas7 October 2008 The Battle of Ideas 2008 will be a two-day festival of high-level, thought-provoking debate organised by the Institute of Ideas and hosted by the Royal College of Art. The ‘Battle for the Family’ strand on Saturday 1 November contains three important debates. 10.30-12.00: Professionalising parenting Parents, apparently, are a bunch of amateurs. No wonder all the youth of today are binge-drinking, obese, antisocial yobs. What is needed, we are told, is constant monitoring of parents, and learning and development support where necessary. How did parenting become the big idea in the 21st century, and why have so many social concerns come to be understood through the prism of parenting? Speakers Zoe Williams - columnist, the Guardian; particular interest in feminism; and babies. 13.30 - 15.00: The problem with families The ‘problem of the family’ has long been a pet subject of social commentators. In the past, critics worried about the threats posed by single parenthood, homosexuality and permissiveness. But with the rise of therapy culture and the mainstreaming of the view that your parents ‘f*** you up’, the policy focus has shifted from a concern about a few ‘problem families’ to the assumption that all families are essentially problematic. What can we expect for the future of the family, when its very existence gives policymakers sleepless nights? Speakers Jennie Bristow - writer on parenting issues and intergenerational relations; author Guide to Subversive Parenting; columnist, spiked; editor, Parents With Attitude.com 15.30 - 17.00: Is ‘poor parenting’ a class issue? Whereas the welfare state attempted to counter the problems facing low-income families through financial assistance, the therapeutic state pursues these families with a relentless programme of emotional support and childrearing advice. From the war on junk food and youth binge drinking to the pressure exerted on parents by schools to improve their own literacy levels, recycling habits, and compliance with healthy lifestyles, the orthodoxy of ‘good parenting’ often seems to be a thinly-veiled attack on the way adults live their lives – often with a heavy dose of snobbery. Are a child’s life chances really determined more by parental behaviour than by family income? Is it right to use children as a conduit for attempting to change the behaviour of ‘hard-to-reach’ adults? What makes a ‘poor parent’ anyway? Speakers See more information here. |
||||